In looking at the three different sizes of Tablets, there are definite pros and cons to each. The small devices consist of Mp3 players, Ipods, and cell phones. The screens are very small and could be hard to read and operate, but they are convenient in that they fit easily in pockets and take up little room. Though this could also cause a problem if the children tried to fit the small device in their pocket to take it home. They only weigh a few ounces so they are easy to carry around and manuever. The large devices have screens that are 8-10". These devices consist of Ipads. They are smaller than most laptops but larger than Ipods. They only weigh two pounds but can become cumbersome if held for long periods of time.The Medium devices have 6-7"screens. They consist mostly of ebooks and Ipad minis. Their main pull was that they were a compromise between the small and large devices. At just under a pound, they weren't as bulky as the Ipads, but they were more user friendly than the Ipods.
I find that the smaller devices aren't really a valid option. They are less expensive, but they are almost too small to use effectively and the small screens provide minimal veiwing options. Between the Medium and Large devices, I think the Medium devices make more sense. They are less expensive, yet provide all the same features as a larger device. They are also less cumbersome to operate.
The three operating systems for these devices are Apple, Android, and Microsoft. Apple provides excellent customer service with stores worldwide to offer face-to-face support. They also require less maintenance and are equipped with apps that have to be purchased with other However, the Apple products are more expensive in comparison to Android and Microsoft tablets. Android products are considerably less expensive. They also offer various looks and feels to their products. Microsoft has just recently broken into the Tablet business. They came out with their version called the Surface in 2012. It is unique in that it has two different keyboard options and is also less expensive in comparison to Apple. The downfall to a Microsoft Tablet is that their Apps store is still very much under construction and isn't as developed as Apple and Google.
Cellular capability cannot be added onto a device once purchased. To purchase a device with this capability already installed, it costs 50-200 dollars more. The service also has to be purchased through a cellular company which is an additional monthly charge. The initial cost is cheaper and the cost for service is cheaper to use a WIFI compatible tablet.
In Conclusion, Microsoft is a fairly new operating system with limitations and limited access to customer service. Android is pretty inexpensive but also has limited customer service. These operating systems are more likely to catch a virus or bug and need assistance. For the school, these options are more financially viable, but might cost more in the long run for maintenance and up-keep. Apple is considerably more expensive in initial costs, but might prove to be comparable to the other systems in the long run. Also, Apple stores can be located in most major cities and provide instant customer service for all of their products. They would also be more user friendly for children.
All options, not much on uses.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise, fine.
Thanks!